New Caledonia vs Oman: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate

New Caledonia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2012
Oman
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
New Caledonia rank
92nd
Oman rank
92nd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Oman
-2000200400600197119942018

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Oman, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1989 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 92nd and Oman ranks 92nd of 142 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 3 and Oman in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Oman Difference Ahead
1980s 33.9 % change on previous year -10.42 % change on previous year 44.32 % change on previous year New Caledonia
1990s 74.73 % change on previous year -38.25 % change on previous year 112.98 % change on previous year New Caledonia
2000s 85.38 % change on previous year -32.87 % change on previous year 118.25 % change on previous year New Caledonia
2010s -100 % change on previous year -29.34 % change on previous year 70.66 % change on previous year Oman

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate, New Caledonia or Oman?
New Caledonia, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Oman as of 2012.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate between New Caledonia and Oman?
0 % change on previous year, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Oman?
18 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2012.
How do New Caledonia and Oman rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate?
New Caledonia ranks 92nd and Oman ranks 92nd of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Oman: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/new-caledonia/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/new-caledonia/oman/">New Caledonia vs Oman: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 5,185 data points, 1971–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.