New Caledonia vs North Macedonia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate

New Caledonia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2012
North Macedonia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2019
New Caledonia rank
92nd
North Macedonia rank
92nd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate over time

  • New Caledonia
  • North Macedonia
-2000200400600800197119952019

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in North Macedonia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was North Macedonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 92nd and North Macedonia ranks 92nd of 142 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 54.34 % change on previous year -1.41 % change on previous year 55.75 % change on previous year New Caledonia
2000s 78.32 % change on previous year 114.48 % change on previous year 36.16 % change on previous year North Macedonia
2010s -57.67 % change on previous year -8.82 % change on previous year 48.84 % change on previous year North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate, New Caledonia or North Macedonia?
New Caledonia, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in North Macedonia as of 2012.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate between New Caledonia and North Macedonia?
0 % change on previous year, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and North Macedonia?
19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2012.
How do New Caledonia and North Macedonia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate?
New Caledonia ranks 92nd and North Macedonia ranks 92nd of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs North Macedonia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/new-caledonia/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/new-caledonia/north-macedonia/">New Caledonia vs North Macedonia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 5,185 data points, 1971–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.