Malaysia vs Rwanda: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate

Malaysia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2019
Rwanda
-100 % change on previous year
in 2019
Malaysia rank
92nd
Rwanda rank
92nd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate over time

  • Malaysia
  • Rwanda
-2000200400600800197119952019

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Rwanda, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 25 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Malaysia ahead.

Malaysia ranks 92nd and Rwanda ranks 92nd of 142 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 172.21 % change on previous year 111.83 % change on previous year 60.38 % change on previous year Malaysia
1980s -2.59 % change on previous year -1.89 % change on previous year 0.7038 % change on previous year Rwanda
1990s -28.35 % change on previous year 57.47 % change on previous year 85.82 % change on previous year Rwanda
2000s 21.69 % change on previous year 80.44 % change on previous year 58.74 % change on previous year Rwanda
2010s 28.53 % change on previous year 88.4 % change on previous year 59.86 % change on previous year Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate, Malaysia or Rwanda?
Malaysia, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Rwanda as of 2019.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate between Malaysia and Rwanda?
0 % change on previous year, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Rwanda?
42 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2019.
How do Malaysia and Rwanda rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate?
Malaysia ranks 92nd and Rwanda ranks 92nd of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Rwanda: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/malaysia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/malaysia/rwanda/">Malaysia vs Rwanda: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 5,185 data points, 1971–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.