Laos vs New Zealand: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate

Laos
208.01 % change on previous year
in 2021
New Zealand
205.99 % change on previous year
in 2021
Laos rank
48th
New Zealand rank
50th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate over time

  • Laos
  • New Zealand
-2000200400600197119962021

How they compare

Laos currently reports 208.01 % change on previous year against 205.99 % change on previous year in New Zealand, a difference of 2.02 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1971 it was New Zealand ahead.

Laos ranks 48th and New Zealand ranks 50th of 142 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Laos averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Laos New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 42.03 % change on previous year 31.82 % change on previous year 10.2 % change on previous year Laos
1980s -24.35 % change on previous year 11.39 % change on previous year 35.74 % change on previous year New Zealand
2000s 100.59 % change on previous year 91.11 % change on previous year 9.48 % change on previous year Laos
2010s 3.43 % change on previous year 4.02 % change on previous year 0.5889 % change on previous year New Zealand
2020s 85.93 % change on previous year 94.9 % change on previous year 8.97 % change on previous year New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate, Laos or New Zealand?
Laos, at 208.01 % change on previous year against 205.99 % change on previous year in New Zealand as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate between Laos and New Zealand?
2.02 % change on previous year, with Laos ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and New Zealand?
31 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2021.
How do Laos and New Zealand rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate?
Laos ranks 48th and New Zealand ranks 50th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Laos vs New Zealand: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/lao-pdr/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/lao-pdr/new-zealand/">Laos vs New Zealand: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 5,185 data points, 1971–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.