Israel vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate

Israel
-100 % change on previous year
in 2019
New Caledonia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2012
Israel rank
92nd
New Caledonia rank
92nd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate over time

  • Israel
  • New Caledonia
-2000200400600800197119952019

How they compare

Israel currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1971 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Israel ranks 92nd and New Caledonia ranks 92nd of 142 countries.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1970s 42.87 % change on previous year -5.34 % change on previous year 48.21 % change on previous year Israel
1980s 308.88 % change on previous year -48.25 % change on previous year 357.13 % change on previous year Israel
2000s 335.43 % change on previous year -3.41 % change on previous year 338.83 % change on previous year Israel
2010s 77.67 % change on previous year -57.67 % change on previous year 135.33 % change on previous year Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate, Israel or New Caledonia?
Israel, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia as of 2019.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate between Israel and New Caledonia?
0 % change on previous year, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and New Caledonia?
15 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2012.
How do Israel and New Caledonia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate?
Israel ranks 92nd and New Caledonia ranks 92nd of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/israel/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/israel/new-caledonia/">Israel vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 5,185 data points, 1971–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.