Hong Kong vs Nepal: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate

Hong Kong
-100 % change on previous year
in 1984
Nepal
-100 % change on previous year
in 2017
Hong Kong rank
92nd
Nepal rank
92nd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Nepal
-2000200400600197119942017

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Nepal, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 92nd and Nepal ranks 92nd of 142 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Nepal Difference Ahead
1970s 188.1 % change on previous year -4.62 % change on previous year 192.71 % change on previous year Hong Kong
1980s 10.79 % change on previous year 14.83 % change on previous year 4.04 % change on previous year Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate, Hong Kong or Nepal?
Hong Kong, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Nepal as of 1984.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate between Hong Kong and Nepal?
0 % change on previous year, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Nepal?
8 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 1984.
How do Hong Kong and Nepal rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate?
Hong Kong ranks 92nd and Nepal ranks 92nd of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Nepal: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/hong-kong-sar-china/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/hong-kong-sar-china/nepal/">Hong Kong vs Nepal: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 5,185 data points, 1971–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.