Equatorial Guinea vs South Korea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate

Equatorial Guinea
-100 % change on previous year
in 2015
South Korea
-98.58 % change on previous year
in 2021
Equatorial Guinea rank
92nd
South Korea rank
91st

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • South Korea
-2000200400600800197119962021

How they compare

South Korea currently reports -98.58 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 1.42 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1999 it was South Korea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 92nd and South Korea ranks 91st of 142 countries.

South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea South Korea Difference Ahead
1990s -34.61 % change on previous year -26.55 % change on previous year 8.06 % change on previous year South Korea
2000s 35.59 % change on previous year 41.99 % change on previous year 6.4 % change on previous year South Korea
2010s -8.24 % change on previous year 37.84 % change on previous year 46.09 % change on previous year South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate, Equatorial Guinea or South Korea?
South Korea, at -98.58 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Equatorial Guinea as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate between Equatorial Guinea and South Korea?
1.42 % change on previous year, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and South Korea?
17 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2015.
How do Equatorial Guinea and South Korea rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 92nd and South Korea ranks 91st of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs South Korea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/equatorial-guinea/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/equatorial-guinea/korea-rep/">Equatorial Guinea vs South Korea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 5,185 data points, 1971–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.