Equatorial Guinea vs Japan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate

Equatorial Guinea
-100 % change on previous year
in 2015
Japan
-77.73 % change on previous year
in 2021
Equatorial Guinea rank
92nd
Japan rank
89th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Japan
-1000100200300197119962021

How they compare

Japan currently reports -77.73 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 22.27 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Japan ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 92nd and Japan ranks 89th of 142 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Japan Difference Ahead
1990s -34.61 % change on previous year 6.02 % change on previous year 40.63 % change on previous year Japan
2000s 35.59 % change on previous year 19.93 % change on previous year 15.66 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
2010s -8.24 % change on previous year 1.51 % change on previous year 9.75 % change on previous year Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate, Equatorial Guinea or Japan?
Japan, at -77.73 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Equatorial Guinea as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate between Equatorial Guinea and Japan?
22.27 % change on previous year, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Japan?
17 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2015.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Japan rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 92nd and Japan ranks 89th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Japan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/equatorial-guinea/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/equatorial-guinea/japan/">Equatorial Guinea vs Japan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 5,185 data points, 1971–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.