Ecuador vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate

Ecuador
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
New Caledonia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2012
Ecuador rank
92nd
New Caledonia rank
92nd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate over time

  • Ecuador
  • New Caledonia
-2000200400600800197119942018

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1971 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Ecuador ranks 92nd and New Caledonia ranks 92nd of 142 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 4 and New Caledonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1970s 22.74 % change on previous year -5.34 % change on previous year 28.08 % change on previous year Ecuador
1980s -33.85 % change on previous year -20.86 % change on previous year 12.99 % change on previous year New Caledonia
1990s 120.66 % change on previous year 56.88 % change on previous year 63.78 % change on previous year Ecuador
2000s 156.18 % change on previous year 78.32 % change on previous year 77.86 % change on previous year Ecuador
2010s 31.95 % change on previous year -57.67 % change on previous year 89.61 % change on previous year Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate, Ecuador or New Caledonia?
Ecuador, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia as of 2018.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate between Ecuador and New Caledonia?
0 % change on previous year, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and New Caledonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2012.
How do Ecuador and New Caledonia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate?
Ecuador ranks 92nd and New Caledonia ranks 92nd of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/new-caledonia/">Ecuador vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 5,185 data points, 1971–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.