Cuba vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate

Cuba
444.62 % change on previous year
in 2021
Sweden
497.5 % change on previous year
in 2021
Cuba rank
8th
Sweden rank
5th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate over time

  • Cuba
  • Sweden
0200400600197119962021

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 497.5 % change on previous year against 444.62 % change on previous year in Cuba, a difference of 52.88 % change on previous year.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 27 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 8th and Sweden ranks 5th of 142 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and Sweden in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Sweden Difference Ahead
1970s 11.6 % change on previous year 53.71 % change on previous year 42.11 % change on previous year Sweden
1980s 4.13 % change on previous year 1.13 % change on previous year 3 % change on previous year Cuba
1990s 23.22 % change on previous year 9.92 % change on previous year 13.3 % change on previous year Cuba
2000s 86.92 % change on previous year 58.53 % change on previous year 28.39 % change on previous year Cuba
2010s 68.35 % change on previous year 52.51 % change on previous year 15.84 % change on previous year Cuba
2020s 222.79 % change on previous year 254.16 % change on previous year 31.36 % change on previous year Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate, Cuba or Sweden?
Sweden, at 497.5 % change on previous year against 444.62 % change on previous year in Cuba as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate between Cuba and Sweden?
52.88 % change on previous year, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sweden?
50 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2021.
How do Cuba and Sweden rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate?
Cuba ranks 8th and Sweden ranks 5th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/cuba/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/cuba/sweden/">Cuba vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 5,185 data points, 1971–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.