Costa Rica vs Greenland: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate

Costa Rica
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
Greenland
-100 % change on previous year
in 2014
Costa Rica rank
92nd
Greenland rank
92nd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Greenland
-2000200400600800197419962018

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Greenland, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 92nd and Greenland ranks 92nd of 142 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 3 and Greenland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Greenland Difference Ahead
1980s 70.85 % change on previous year 23.29 % change on previous year 47.55 % change on previous year Costa Rica
1990s 82.97 % change on previous year -10.6 % change on previous year 93.57 % change on previous year Costa Rica
2000s 116.99 % change on previous year 28.94 % change on previous year 88.06 % change on previous year Costa Rica
2010s -45.06 % change on previous year 2.54 % change on previous year 47.6 % change on previous year Greenland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate, Costa Rica or Greenland?
Costa Rica, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Greenland as of 2018.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate between Costa Rica and Greenland?
0 % change on previous year, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Greenland?
22 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2014.
How do Costa Rica and Greenland rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate?
Costa Rica ranks 92nd and Greenland ranks 92nd of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Greenland: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/costa-rica/greenland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/costa-rica/greenland/">Costa Rica vs Greenland: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 5,185 data points, 1971–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.