Congo vs Norway: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate
Congo
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
Norway
-100 % change on previous year
in 2016
Congo rank
92nd
Norway rank
92nd
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate over time
- Congo
- Norway
How they compare
Congo currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Norway, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 20 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 92nd and Norway ranks 92nd of 142 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Norway in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 80.69 % change on previous year | 23.22 % change on previous year | 57.47 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 1980s | 88.48 % change on previous year | 17.06 % change on previous year | 71.41 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 1990s | 76.1 % change on previous year | -24.04 % change on previous year | 100.14 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 2000s | 31.96 % change on previous year | 91.46 % change on previous year | 59.5 % change on previous year | Norway |
| 2010s | 17.41 % change on previous year | 73.51 % change on previous year | 56.09 % change on previous year | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate, Congo or Norway?
- Congo, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Norway as of 2018.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate between Congo and Norway?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Norway?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2016.
- How do Congo and Norway rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate?
- Congo ranks 92nd and Norway ranks 92nd of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.