Congo vs Greenland: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate
Congo
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
Greenland
-100 % change on previous year
in 2014
Congo rank
92nd
Greenland rank
92nd
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate over time
- Congo
- Greenland
How they compare
Congo currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Greenland, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 19 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Greenland ahead.
Congo ranks 92nd and Greenland ranks 92nd of 142 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Greenland in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 18.28 % change on previous year | 87.03 % change on previous year | 68.76 % change on previous year | Greenland |
| 1980s | -16.21 % change on previous year | 23.29 % change on previous year | 39.5 % change on previous year | Greenland |
| 1990s | 88.4 % change on previous year | -13 % change on previous year | 101.4 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 2000s | 42.64 % change on previous year | 28.94 % change on previous year | 13.71 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 2010s | -18.92 % change on previous year | 2.54 % change on previous year | 21.46 % change on previous year | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate, Congo or Greenland?
- Congo, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Greenland as of 2018.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate between Congo and Greenland?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Greenland?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2014.
- How do Congo and Greenland rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate?
- Congo ranks 92nd and Greenland ranks 92nd of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.