Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate

Congo
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
Equatorial Guinea
-100 % change on previous year
in 2015
Congo rank
92nd
Equatorial Guinea rank
92nd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate over time

  • Congo
  • Equatorial Guinea
-2000200400600800197119942018

How they compare

Congo currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 92nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 92nd of 142 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s -34.61 % change on previous year -34.61 % change on previous year 0.0001 % change on previous year Congo
2000s 31.96 % change on previous year 47.52 % change on previous year 15.56 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
2010s 15.56 % change on previous year -8.24 % change on previous year 23.8 % change on previous year Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate, Congo or Equatorial Guinea?
Congo, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Equatorial Guinea as of 2018.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate between Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
0 % change on previous year, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
16 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2015.
How do Congo and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate?
Congo ranks 92nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 92nd of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/congo-rep/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/congo-rep/equatorial-guinea/">Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 5,185 data points, 1971–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.