Congo vs Costa Rica: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate

Congo
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
Costa Rica
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
Congo rank
92nd
Costa Rica rank
92nd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate over time

  • Congo
  • Costa Rica
-2000200400600800197119942018

How they compare

Congo currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Costa Rica, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Congo ranks 92nd and Costa Rica ranks 92nd of 142 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Costa Rica in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1980s 88.48 % change on previous year 48.78 % change on previous year 39.7 % change on previous year Congo
1990s 71.01 % change on previous year 61.13 % change on previous year 9.88 % change on previous year Congo
2000s 31.96 % change on previous year 82.14 % change on previous year 50.18 % change on previous year Costa Rica
2010s 0.3264 % change on previous year 10.08 % change on previous year 9.75 % change on previous year Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate, Congo or Costa Rica?
Congo, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Costa Rica as of 2018.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate between Congo and Costa Rica?
0 % change on previous year, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Costa Rica?
35 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
How do Congo and Costa Rica rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate?
Congo ranks 92nd and Costa Rica ranks 92nd of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Costa Rica: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/congo-rep/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/congo-rep/costa-rica/">Congo vs Costa Rica: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 5,185 data points, 1971–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.