Chad vs Greenland: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate
Chad
-100 % change on previous year
in 2017
Greenland
-100 % change on previous year
in 2014
Chad rank
92nd
Greenland rank
92nd
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate over time
- Chad
- Greenland
How they compare
Chad currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Greenland, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 92nd and Greenland ranks 92nd of 142 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Greenland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.3 % change on previous year | 21.9 % change on previous year | 27.4 % change on previous year | Chad |
| 2010s | -59.16 % change on previous year | 51.03 % change on previous year | 110.19 % change on previous year | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate, Chad or Greenland?
- Chad, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Greenland as of 2017.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate between Chad and Greenland?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Greenland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Chad and Greenland rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate?
- Chad ranks 92nd and Greenland ranks 92nd of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.