Belgium vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate
Belgium
-100 % change on previous year
in 1984
New Caledonia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2012
Belgium rank
92nd
New Caledonia rank
92nd
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate over time
- Belgium
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 5 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 92nd and New Caledonia ranks 92nd of 142 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate, Belgium or New Caledonia?
- Belgium, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia as of 1984.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate between Belgium and New Caledonia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and New Caledonia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 1978.
- How do Belgium and New Caledonia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate?
- Belgium ranks 92nd and New Caledonia ranks 92nd of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.