Austria vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate

Austria
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
New Caledonia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2012
Austria rank
92nd
New Caledonia rank
92nd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate over time

  • Austria
  • New Caledonia
-2000200400600800197119942018

How they compare

Austria currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1971 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Austria ranks 92nd and New Caledonia ranks 92nd of 142 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 3 and New Caledonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1970s 43.66 % change on previous year -5.34 % change on previous year 49.01 % change on previous year Austria
1980s -16.17 % change on previous year -20.86 % change on previous year 4.69 % change on previous year Austria
1990s 34.07 % change on previous year 57.3 % change on previous year 23.23 % change on previous year New Caledonia
2000s 74.16 % change on previous year 78.32 % change on previous year 4.16 % change on previous year New Caledonia
2010s 14.89 % change on previous year -57.67 % change on previous year 72.56 % change on previous year Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate, Austria or New Caledonia?
Austria, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia as of 2018.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate between Austria and New Caledonia?
0 % change on previous year, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and New Caledonia?
33 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2012.
How do Austria and New Caledonia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate?
Austria ranks 92nd and New Caledonia ranks 92nd of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/austria/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/austria/new-caledonia/">Austria vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 5,185 data points, 1971–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.