Angola vs Tunisia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate
Angola
-100 % change on previous year
in 1976
Tunisia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2019
Angola rank
92nd
Tunisia rank
92nd
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate over time
- Angola
- Tunisia
How they compare
Angola currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Tunisia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 92nd and Tunisia ranks 92nd of 142 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate, Angola or Tunisia?
- Angola, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Tunisia as of 1976.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate between Angola and Tunisia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Tunisia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 1976.
- How do Angola and Tunisia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate?
- Angola ranks 92nd and Tunisia ranks 92nd of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.