Angola vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate
Angola
-100 % change on previous year
in 1976
New Caledonia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2012
Angola rank
92nd
New Caledonia rank
92nd
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate over time
- Angola
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Angola currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 92nd and New Caledonia ranks 92nd of 142 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate, Angola or New Caledonia?
- Angola, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia as of 1976.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate between Angola and New Caledonia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and New Caledonia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 1976.
- How do Angola and New Caledonia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), annual growth rate?
- Angola ranks 92nd and New Caledonia ranks 92nd of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.