Solomon Islands vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Solomon Islands
10,227 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Zimbabwe
9,148 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Solomon Islands rank
147th
Zimbabwe rank
149th

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Solomon Islands
  • Zimbabwe
-10.0k-5.0k05.0k10.0k197719982020

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 10,227 current US$ per square kilometre against 9,148 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1,079 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Solomon Islands ranks 147th and Zimbabwe ranks 149th of 176 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Solomon Islands averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Solomon Islands Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s -6,202 current US$ per square kilometre -21.11 current US$ per square kilometre 6,180 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s -2,593 current US$ per square kilometre -906.83 current US$ per square kilometre 1,687 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 3,737 current US$ per square kilometre -1,649 current US$ per square kilometre 5,387 current US$ per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2010s 6,449 current US$ per square kilometre 337.68 current US$ per square kilometre 6,111 current US$ per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2020s 10,227 current US$ per square kilometre 9,148 current US$ per square kilometre 1,079 current US$ per square kilometre Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Solomon Islands or Zimbabwe?
Solomon Islands, at 10,227 current US$ per square kilometre against 9,148 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Solomon Islands and Zimbabwe?
1,079 current US$ per square kilometre, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Zimbabwe?
27 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
How do Solomon Islands and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Solomon Islands ranks 147th and Zimbabwe ranks 149th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Solomon Islands vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/solomon-islands/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/solomon-islands/zimbabwe/">Solomon Islands vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 5,834 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.