Sierra Leone vs East Timor: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Sierra Leone
178.57 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
East Timor
-13,696 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Sierra Leone rank
171st
East Timor rank
174th

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Sierra Leone
  • East Timor
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k197719992021

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 178.57 current US$ per square kilometre against -13,696 current US$ per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 13,875 current US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 15 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.

Sierra Leone ranks 171st and East Timor ranks 174th of 176 countries.

East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sierra Leone East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 2,805 current US$ per square kilometre 99,987 current US$ per square kilometre 97,182 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor
2010s -24.27 current US$ per square kilometre 103,472 current US$ per square kilometre 103,496 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor
2020s 178.57 current US$ per square kilometre 14,327 current US$ per square kilometre 14,149 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Sierra Leone or East Timor?
Sierra Leone, at 178.57 current US$ per square kilometre against -13,696 current US$ per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2020.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Sierra Leone and East Timor?
13,875 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and East Timor?
15 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
How do Sierra Leone and East Timor rank globally for adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Sierra Leone ranks 171st and East Timor ranks 174th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sierra Leone vs East Timor: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sierra-leone/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sierra-leone/timor-leste/">Sierra Leone vs East Timor: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 5,834 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.