How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?

8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2018.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malta vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Malta

15.82 million current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Sint Maarten (Dutch part)

15.78 million current US$ per square kilometre

in 2018

Malta rank

5th

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank

6th

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

Malta
Sint Maarten (Dutch part)

How they compare

Malta currently reports 15.82 million current US$ per square kilometre against 15.78 million current US$ per square kilometre in Sint Maarten (Dutch part), a difference of 39,400 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 5th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 6th of 176 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Malta or Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?: Malta, at 15.82 million current US$ per square kilometre against 15.78 million current US$ per square kilometre in Sint Maarten (Dutch part) as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Malta and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?: 39,400 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?: 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2018.
How do Malta and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank globally for adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre?: Malta ranks 5th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 6th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/sint-maarten-dutch-part/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/sint-maarten-dutch-part/">Malta vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit: current US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 5,834 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed: 01 October 2026

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.