Malta vs Netherlands: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Malta
15.82 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Netherlands
8.61 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Malta rank
5th
Netherlands rank
8th

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Malta
  • Netherlands
05.0M10.0M15.0M197019952021

How they compare

Malta currently reports 15.82 million current US$ per square kilometre against 8.61 million current US$ per square kilometre in Netherlands, a difference of 7.21 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.8 times Netherlands's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Netherlands ahead.

Malta ranks 5th and Netherlands ranks 8th of 176 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 2 and Netherlands in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Netherlands Difference Ahead
1970s 429,980 current US$ per square kilometre 775,209 current US$ per square kilometre 345,229 current US$ per square kilometre Netherlands
1980s 1.34 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.37 million current US$ per square kilometre 35,843 current US$ per square kilometre Netherlands
1990s 2.66 million current US$ per square kilometre 3.02 million current US$ per square kilometre 357,461 current US$ per square kilometre Netherlands
2000s 3.02 million current US$ per square kilometre 4.96 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.95 million current US$ per square kilometre Netherlands
2010s 9.13 million current US$ per square kilometre 7.01 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.12 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 13.66 million current US$ per square kilometre 7.94 million current US$ per square kilometre 5.72 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Malta or Netherlands?
Malta, at 15.82 million current US$ per square kilometre against 8.61 million current US$ per square kilometre in Netherlands as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Malta and Netherlands?
7.21 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Netherlands?
51 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2021.
How do Malta and Netherlands rank globally for adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Malta ranks 5th and Netherlands ranks 8th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Netherlands: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/netherlands/">Malta vs Netherlands: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 5,834 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.