Kyrgyzstan vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Kyrgyzstan
8,968 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Zimbabwe
9,148 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
150th
Zimbabwe rank
149th

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Zimbabwe
-5.0k05.0k10.0k15.0k197719992021

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 9,148 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,968 current US$ per square kilometre in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 180 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 150th and Zimbabwe ranks 149th of 176 countries.

Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 567.97 current US$ per square kilometre -483.78 current US$ per square kilometre 1,052 current US$ per square kilometre Kyrgyzstan
2000s 6,152 current US$ per square kilometre -1,649 current US$ per square kilometre 7,801 current US$ per square kilometre Kyrgyzstan
2010s 6,848 current US$ per square kilometre 337.68 current US$ per square kilometre 6,510 current US$ per square kilometre Kyrgyzstan
2020s 12,625 current US$ per square kilometre 9,148 current US$ per square kilometre 3,477 current US$ per square kilometre Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Kyrgyzstan or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 9,148 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,968 current US$ per square kilometre in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Kyrgyzstan and Zimbabwe?
180 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Zimbabwe?
14 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2020.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 150th and Zimbabwe ranks 149th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kyrgyz-republic/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kyrgyz-republic/zimbabwe/">Kyrgyzstan vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 5,834 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.