Hong Kong vs Malta: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Hong Kong
101.66 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Malta
15.82 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Hong Kong rank
3rd
Malta rank
5th

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Malta
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M197119962021

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 101.66 million current US$ per square kilometre against 15.82 million current US$ per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 85.84 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 6.4 times Malta's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 3rd and Malta ranks 5th of 176 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Malta Difference Ahead
1990s 49.49 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.58 million current US$ per square kilometre 46.91 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2000s 58.62 million current US$ per square kilometre 3.02 million current US$ per square kilometre 55.61 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2010s 75.11 million current US$ per square kilometre 9.13 million current US$ per square kilometre 65.98 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 93.35 million current US$ per square kilometre 13.66 million current US$ per square kilometre 79.69 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Hong Kong or Malta?
Hong Kong, at 101.66 million current US$ per square kilometre against 15.82 million current US$ per square kilometre in Malta as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Hong Kong and Malta?
85.84 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Malta?
24 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2021.
How do Hong Kong and Malta rank globally for adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Hong Kong ranks 3rd and Malta ranks 5th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Malta: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/malta/">Hong Kong vs Malta: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 5,834 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.