Guinea vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Guinea
1,251 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Namibia
1,067 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Guinea rank
165th
Namibia rank
168th

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Guinea
  • Namibia
-2.0k02.0k4.0k198620032021

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 1,251 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,067 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 184 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guinea ahead.

Guinea ranks 165th and Namibia ranks 168th of 176 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 2,582 current US$ per square kilometre 1,222 current US$ per square kilometre 1,360 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea
2000s 989.11 current US$ per square kilometre 2,109 current US$ per square kilometre 1,120 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 1,025 current US$ per square kilometre 2,251 current US$ per square kilometre 1,226 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 1,460 current US$ per square kilometre 1,678 current US$ per square kilometre 218.14 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Guinea or Namibia?
Guinea, at 1,251 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,067 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Guinea and Namibia?
184 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Namibia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Guinea and Namibia rank globally for adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Guinea ranks 165th and Namibia ranks 168th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea/namibia/">Guinea vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 5,834 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.