Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Guinea-Bissau
6,907 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Zimbabwe
9,148 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau rank
152nd
Zimbabwe rank
149th

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Zimbabwe
-5.0k05.0k10.0k197719982020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 9,148 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,907 current US$ per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 2,241 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 152nd and Zimbabwe ranks 149th of 176 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 52.13 current US$ per square kilometre -47.9 current US$ per square kilometre 100.03 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1990s 692.69 current US$ per square kilometre -906.83 current US$ per square kilometre 1,600 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 1,474 current US$ per square kilometre -1,649 current US$ per square kilometre 3,124 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2010s 3,319 current US$ per square kilometre 337.68 current US$ per square kilometre 2,981 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2020s 6,907 current US$ per square kilometre 9,148 current US$ per square kilometre 2,241 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Guinea-Bissau or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 9,148 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,907 current US$ per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2020.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe?
2,241 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe?
25 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2020.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 152nd and Zimbabwe ranks 149th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/zimbabwe/">Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 5,834 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.