Guatemala vs Kiribati: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Guatemala
153,884 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Kiribati
132,086 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Guatemala rank
76th
Kiribati rank
79th

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Kiribati
050.0k100.0k150.0k197719992021

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 153,884 current US$ per square kilometre against 132,086 current US$ per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 21,798 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.2 times Kiribati's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Kiribati ahead.

Guatemala ranks 76th and Kiribati ranks 79th of 176 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Kiribati in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Kiribati Difference Ahead
1970s 10,381 current US$ per square kilometre 26,450 current US$ per square kilometre 16,070 current US$ per square kilometre Kiribati
1980s 7,379 current US$ per square kilometre 22,214 current US$ per square kilometre 14,835 current US$ per square kilometre Kiribati
1990s 9,769 current US$ per square kilometre 48,660 current US$ per square kilometre 38,890 current US$ per square kilometre Kiribati
2000s 42,794 current US$ per square kilometre 8,168 current US$ per square kilometre 34,626 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 75,649 current US$ per square kilometre 103,243 current US$ per square kilometre 27,594 current US$ per square kilometre Kiribati
2020s 132,256 current US$ per square kilometre 132,086 current US$ per square kilometre 170 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Kiribati?
Guatemala, at 153,884 current US$ per square kilometre against 132,086 current US$ per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Kiribati?
21,798 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Kiribati?
29 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2020.
How do Guatemala and Kiribati rank globally for adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 76th and Kiribati ranks 79th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Kiribati: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/kiribati/">Guatemala vs Kiribati: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 5,834 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.