Eritrea vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Eritrea
1,106 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2000
Namibia
1,067 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Eritrea rank
167th
Namibia rank
168th

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Eritrea
  • Namibia
01.0k2.0k3.0k199020052021

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 1,106 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,067 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 39 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.

Eritrea ranks 167th and Namibia ranks 168th of 176 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 1,600 current US$ per square kilometre 1,252 current US$ per square kilometre 348.31 current US$ per square kilometre Eritrea
2000s 1,106 current US$ per square kilometre 1,317 current US$ per square kilometre 210.58 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Eritrea or Namibia?
Eritrea, at 1,106 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,067 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2000.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Eritrea and Namibia?
39 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Namibia?
8 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2000.
How do Eritrea and Namibia rank globally for adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Eritrea ranks 167th and Namibia ranks 168th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/namibia/">Eritrea vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 5,834 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.