Dominican Republic vs Norway: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Dominican Republic
543,440 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Norway
533,566 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Dominican Republic rank
35th
Norway rank
36th

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Norway
0200.0k400.0k600.0k197019952021

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 543,440 current US$ per square kilometre against 533,566 current US$ per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 9,874 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Norway ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 35th and Norway ranks 36th of 176 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Norway Difference Ahead
1970s 17,300 current US$ per square kilometre 31,403 current US$ per square kilometre 14,103 current US$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 14,903 current US$ per square kilometre 60,042 current US$ per square kilometre 45,139 current US$ per square kilometre Norway
1990s 63,185 current US$ per square kilometre 107,059 current US$ per square kilometre 43,874 current US$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 152,663 current US$ per square kilometre 301,540 current US$ per square kilometre 148,878 current US$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 303,374 current US$ per square kilometre 444,103 current US$ per square kilometre 140,730 current US$ per square kilometre Norway
2020s 458,600 current US$ per square kilometre 422,906 current US$ per square kilometre 35,694 current US$ per square kilometre Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Dominican Republic or Norway?
Dominican Republic, at 543,440 current US$ per square kilometre against 533,566 current US$ per square kilometre in Norway as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Dominican Republic and Norway?
9,874 current US$ per square kilometre, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Norway?
47 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2021.
How do Dominican Republic and Norway rank globally for adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Dominican Republic ranks 35th and Norway ranks 36th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Norway: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/norway/">Dominican Republic vs Norway: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 5,834 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.