Democratic Republic of Congo vs Guinea-Bissau: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Democratic Republic of Congo
5,854 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Guinea-Bissau
6,907 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
154th
Guinea-Bissau rank
152nd

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Guinea-Bissau
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k198220012021

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 6,907 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,854 current US$ per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 1,053 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.2 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 154th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 152nd of 176 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
2000s 622.31 current US$ per square kilometre 1,615 current US$ per square kilometre 992.98 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2010s 2,348 current US$ per square kilometre 3,319 current US$ per square kilometre 970.38 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2020s 4,820 current US$ per square kilometre 6,907 current US$ per square kilometre 2,087 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Democratic Republic of Congo or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 6,907 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,854 current US$ per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2020.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Democratic Republic of Congo and Guinea-Bissau?
1,053 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Guinea-Bissau?
16 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2020.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 154th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 152nd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Guinea-Bissau: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/guinea-bissau/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Guinea-Bissau: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 5,834 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.