China vs Curacao: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre
China
847,944 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Curacao
936,782 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2017
China rank
30th
Curacao rank
29th
Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time
- China
- Curacao
How they compare
Curacao currently reports 936,782 current US$ per square kilometre against 847,944 current US$ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 88,838 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Curacao's figure about 1.1 times China's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Curacao has been ahead every year.
China ranks 30th and Curacao ranks 29th of 176 countries.
Curacao has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre, China or Curacao?
- Curacao, at 936,782 current US$ per square kilometre against 847,944 current US$ per square kilometre in China as of 2017.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre between China and Curacao?
- 88,838 current US$ per square kilometre, with Curacao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Curacao?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2017.
- How do China and Curacao rank globally for adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
- China ranks 30th and Curacao ranks 29th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.