Chile vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Chile
79,934 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Saudi Arabia
80,360 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Chile rank
92nd
Saudi Arabia rank
91st

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Saudi Arabia
050.0k100.0k150.0k197119962021

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 80,360 current US$ per square kilometre against 79,934 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 426 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Chile ranks 92nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 91st of 176 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Saudi Arabia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1970s 2,199 current US$ per square kilometre 15,894 current US$ per square kilometre 13,695 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1980s 4,148 current US$ per square kilometre 15,865 current US$ per square kilometre 11,717 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1990s 19,442 current US$ per square kilometre 12,138 current US$ per square kilometre 7,303 current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 40,253 current US$ per square kilometre 61,684 current US$ per square kilometre 21,431 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2010s 76,737 current US$ per square kilometre 124,141 current US$ per square kilometre 47,404 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2020s 67,770 current US$ per square kilometre 80,360 current US$ per square kilometre 12,591 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Chile or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 80,360 current US$ per square kilometre against 79,934 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2020.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Chile and Saudi Arabia?
426 current US$ per square kilometre, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Saudi Arabia?
46 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2020.
How do Chile and Saudi Arabia rank globally for adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 92nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 91st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/saudi-arabia/">Chile vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 5,834 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.