Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Burkina Faso
9,973 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2019
Zimbabwe
9,148 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Burkina Faso rank
148th
Zimbabwe rank
149th

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Zimbabwe
-5.0k05.0k10.0k197719982020

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 9,973 current US$ per square kilometre against 9,148 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 825 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 148th and Zimbabwe ranks 149th of 176 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 3,970 current US$ per square kilometre -1,649 current US$ per square kilometre 5,619 current US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2010s 7,473 current US$ per square kilometre 337.68 current US$ per square kilometre 7,135 current US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Zimbabwe?
Burkina Faso, at 9,973 current US$ per square kilometre against 9,148 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
825 current US$ per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Burkina Faso ranks 148th and Zimbabwe ranks 149th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/">Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 5,834 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.