Barbados vs China: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Barbados
620,530 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2017
China
847,944 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Barbados rank
33rd
China rank
30th

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • China
0500.0k1.0M1.5M198220012021

How they compare

China currently reports 847,944 current US$ per square kilometre against 620,530 current US$ per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 227,414 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.4 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 33rd and China ranks 30th of 176 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados China Difference Ahead
1980s 1.22 million current US$ per square kilometre 12,011 current US$ per square kilometre 1.21 million current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 662,014 current US$ per square kilometre 28,504 current US$ per square kilometre 633,510 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 786,835 current US$ per square kilometre 130,099 current US$ per square kilometre 656,736 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 508,158 current US$ per square kilometre 480,045 current US$ per square kilometre 28,113 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Barbados or China?
China, at 847,944 current US$ per square kilometre against 620,530 current US$ per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Barbados and China?
227,414 current US$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and China?
32 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2017.
How do Barbados and China rank globally for adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 33rd and China ranks 30th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs China: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/china/">Barbados vs China: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 5,834 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.