Aruba vs Italy: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Aruba
2.60 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Italy
1.65 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Aruba rank
20th
Italy rank
23rd

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Italy
01.0M2.0M3.0M197019952021

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 2.60 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.65 million current US$ per square kilometre in Italy, a difference of 950,920 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Aruba's figure about 1.6 times Italy's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 20th and Italy ranks 23rd of 176 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Italy Difference Ahead
1990s 2.15 million current US$ per square kilometre 931,447 current US$ per square kilometre 1.21 million current US$ per square kilometre Aruba
2000s 1.57 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.19 million current US$ per square kilometre 372,971 current US$ per square kilometre Aruba
2010s 1.63 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.33 million current US$ per square kilometre 296,228 current US$ per square kilometre Aruba
2020s 1.69 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.51 million current US$ per square kilometre 175,720 current US$ per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Aruba or Italy?
Aruba, at 2.60 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.65 million current US$ per square kilometre in Italy as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Aruba and Italy?
950,920 current US$ per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Italy?
27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
How do Aruba and Italy rank globally for adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 20th and Italy ranks 23rd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Italy: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/italy/">Aruba vs Italy: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 5,834 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.