Antigua and Barbuda vs United States: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda
444,905 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
United States
461,333 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Antigua and Barbuda rank
45th
United States rank
43rd

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • United States
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M197019952021

How they compare

United States currently reports 461,333 current US$ per square kilometre against 444,905 current US$ per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 16,428 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 45th and United States ranks 43rd of 176 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 3 and United States in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda United States Difference Ahead
1990s 305,947 current US$ per square kilometre 175,102 current US$ per square kilometre 130,845 current US$ per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 315,494 current US$ per square kilometre 241,382 current US$ per square kilometre 74,113 current US$ per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 399,017 current US$ per square kilometre 371,070 current US$ per square kilometre 27,946 current US$ per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 444,905 current US$ per square kilometre 447,013 current US$ per square kilometre 2,108 current US$ per square kilometre United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or United States?
United States, at 461,333 current US$ per square kilometre against 444,905 current US$ per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and United States?
16,428 current US$ per square kilometre, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and United States?
28 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2020.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and United States rank globally for adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 45th and United States ranks 43rd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs United States: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/united-states/">Antigua and Barbuda vs United States: Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 5,834 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.