Canada vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per capita
Canada
11,921 current US$ per person
in 2021
Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
13,510 current US$ per person
in 2018
Canada rank
24th
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank
21st
Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per capita over time
- Canada
- Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
How they compare
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) currently reports 13,510 current US$ per person against 11,921 current US$ per person in Canada, a difference of 1,589 current US$ per person.
That makes Sint Maarten (Dutch part)'s figure about 1.1 times Canada's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 24th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 21st of 178 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per capita, Canada or Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
- Sint Maarten (Dutch part), at 13,510 current US$ per person against 11,921 current US$ per person in Canada as of 2018.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per capita between Canada and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
- 1,589 current US$ per person, with Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2018.
- How do Canada and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank globally for adjusted savings: gross savings (current us$), per capita?
- Canada ranks 24th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 21st of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: gross savings (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.