Aruba vs Greenland: Adjusted savings: energy depletion
Adjusted savings: energy depletion over time
- Aruba
- Greenland
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Greenland, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Greenland ahead.
Aruba ranks 139th and Greenland ranks 139th of 202 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion, Aruba or Greenland?
- Aruba, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Greenland as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion between Aruba and Greenland?
- 0.0%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Greenland?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2007.
- How do Aruba and Greenland rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion?
- Aruba ranks 139th and Greenland ranks 139th of 202 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Energy depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of energy resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers coal, crude oil, and natural gas. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.