Georgia vs Hong Kong, China: Adjusted savings: energy depletion

Georgia
555,844 current US$
in 2021
Hong Kong, China
954,521 current US$
in 2021
Georgia rank
131st
Hong Kong, China rank
130th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion over time

  • Georgia
  • Hong Kong, China
0200.0M400.0M600.0M197019952021

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 954,521 current US$ against 555,844 current US$ in Georgia, a difference of 398,677 current US$.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.7 times Georgia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 131st and Hong Kong, China ranks 130th of 208 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 4 and Hong Kong, China in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1970s 64.83 million current US$ 0 current US$ 64.83 million current US$ Georgia
1980s 190.22 million current US$ 0 current US$ 190.22 million current US$ Georgia
1990s 6.81 million current US$ 0 current US$ 6.81 million current US$ Georgia
2000s 5.80 million current US$ 0 current US$ 5.80 million current US$ Georgia
2010s 2.89 million current US$ 6.48 million current US$ 3.59 million current US$ Hong Kong, China
2020s 400,751 current US$ 629,580 current US$ 228,828 current US$ Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion, Georgia or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 954,521 current US$ against 555,844 current US$ in Georgia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion between Georgia and Hong Kong, China?
398,677 current US$, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Hong Kong, China?
51 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2021.
How do Georgia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion?
Georgia ranks 131st and Hong Kong, China ranks 130th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Hong Kong, China: Adjusted savings: energy depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us/georgia/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us/georgia/hong-kong-sar-china/">Georgia vs Hong Kong, China: Adjusted savings: energy depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 9,765 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Energy depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of energy resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers coal, crude oil, and natural gas. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.