Democratic Republic of Congo vs Sudan: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP

Democratic Republic of Congo
0.0041 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2021
Sudan
0.0042 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2021
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
67th
Sudan rank
66th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Sudan
00.050.10.15197119962021

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 0.0042 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0041 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 67th and Sudan ranks 66th of 205 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 4 and Sudan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Sudan Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0024 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0024 current US$ per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo
1980s 0.0092 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0092 current US$ per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo
1990s 0.0111 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0018 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0093 current US$ per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo
2000s 0.0132 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0882 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.075 current US$ per US$ of GDP Sudan
2010s 0.0078 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0274 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0196 current US$ per US$ of GDP Sudan
2020s 0.0033 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0033 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per unit of gdp, Democratic Republic of Congo or Sudan?
Sudan, at 0.0042 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0041 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per unit of gdp between Democratic Republic of Congo and Sudan?
0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Sudan?
51 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2021.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Sudan rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 67th and Sudan ranks 66th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Sudan: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-dem-rep/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-dem-rep/sudan/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Sudan: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 8,885 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.