Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Sudan
77.04 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Zimbabwe
80.86 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Sudan rank
111th
Zimbabwe rank
109th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Sudan
  • Zimbabwe
0100200300400197119962021

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 80.86 current US$ per square kilometre against 77.04 current US$ per square kilometre in Sudan, a difference of 3.82 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.

Sudan ranks 111th and Zimbabwe ranks 109th of 206 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sudan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 156.95 current US$ per square kilometre 99.94 current US$ per square kilometre 57.01 current US$ per square kilometre Sudan
2020s 55.23 current US$ per square kilometre 61.88 current US$ per square kilometre 6.65 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Sudan or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 80.86 current US$ per square kilometre against 77.04 current US$ per square kilometre in Sudan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Sudan and Zimbabwe?
3.82 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?
10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
How do Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Sudan ranks 111th and Zimbabwe ranks 109th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sudan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sudan/zimbabwe/">Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.