Norway vs East Timor: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Norway
106,567 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
East Timor
72,632 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Norway rank
7th
East Timor rank
10th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Norway
  • East Timor
050.0k100.0k150.0k197019952021

How they compare

Norway currently reports 106,567 current US$ per square kilometre against 72,632 current US$ per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 33,935 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.5 times East Timor's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Norway ahead.

Norway ranks 7th and East Timor ranks 10th of 206 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 2 and East Timor in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 44,364 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 44,364 current US$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 47,425 current US$ per square kilometre 52,938 current US$ per square kilometre 5,513 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor
2020s 69,731 current US$ per square kilometre 58,202 current US$ per square kilometre 11,528 current US$ per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Norway or East Timor?
Norway, at 106,567 current US$ per square kilometre against 72,632 current US$ per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Norway and East Timor?
33,935 current US$ per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and East Timor?
8 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2021.
How do Norway and East Timor rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Norway ranks 7th and East Timor ranks 10th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs East Timor: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/norway/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/norway/timor-leste/">Norway vs East Timor: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.