Netherlands vs East Timor: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Netherlands
88,882 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
East Timor
72,632 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Netherlands rank
9th
East Timor rank
10th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Netherlands
  • East Timor
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k197019952021

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 88,882 current US$ per square kilometre against 72,632 current US$ per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 16,250 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Netherlands's figure about 1.2 times East Timor's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Netherlands ahead.

Netherlands ranks 9th and East Timor ranks 10th of 206 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Netherlands averaged higher in 2 and East Timor in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 57,296 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 57,296 current US$ per square kilometre Netherlands
2010s 62,797 current US$ per square kilometre 52,938 current US$ per square kilometre 9,859 current US$ per square kilometre Netherlands
2020s 53,912 current US$ per square kilometre 58,202 current US$ per square kilometre 4,291 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Netherlands or East Timor?
Netherlands, at 88,882 current US$ per square kilometre against 72,632 current US$ per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Netherlands and East Timor?
16,250 current US$ per square kilometre, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and East Timor?
8 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2021.
How do Netherlands and East Timor rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Netherlands ranks 9th and East Timor ranks 10th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Netherlands vs East Timor: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/netherlands/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/netherlands/timor-leste/">Netherlands vs East Timor: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.