Nauru vs Singapore: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Nauru
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Singapore
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Nauru rank
139th
Singapore rank
139th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Nauru
  • Singapore
01.0M2.0M3.0M197119962021

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 39 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Nauru ahead.

Nauru ranks 139th and Singapore ranks 139th of 206 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 3 and Singapore in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nauru Singapore Difference Ahead
1980s 448,271 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 448,271 current US$ per square kilometre Nauru
1990s 149,854 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 149,854 current US$ per square kilometre Nauru
2000s 672,367 current US$ per square kilometre 9,248 current US$ per square kilometre 663,119 current US$ per square kilometre Nauru
2010s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 146,207 current US$ per square kilometre 146,207 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Nauru or Singapore?
Nauru, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Nauru and Singapore?
0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Singapore?
39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2021.
How do Nauru and Singapore rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Nauru ranks 139th and Singapore ranks 139th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nauru vs Singapore: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/naoero/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/naoero/singapore/">Nauru vs Singapore: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.