Mozambique vs Tanzania: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Mozambique
118.53 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Tanzania
159.46 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Mozambique rank
105th
Tanzania rank
104th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Mozambique
  • Tanzania
0100200300400197119962021

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 159.46 current US$ per square kilometre against 118.53 current US$ per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 40.93 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.3 times Mozambique's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Mozambique ahead.

Mozambique ranks 105th and Tanzania ranks 104th of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 5 and Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Tanzania Difference Ahead
1970s 0.5685 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0001 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5684 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
1980s 0.3911 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0029 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3882 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
1990s 0.0609 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0118 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0491 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
2000s 69.28 current US$ per square kilometre 12.75 current US$ per square kilometre 56.53 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
2010s 174.37 current US$ per square kilometre 64.36 current US$ per square kilometre 110.01 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
2020s 87.03 current US$ per square kilometre 120.76 current US$ per square kilometre 33.73 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Mozambique or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 159.46 current US$ per square kilometre against 118.53 current US$ per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Mozambique and Tanzania?
40.93 current US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Tanzania?
51 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2021.
How do Mozambique and Tanzania rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Mozambique ranks 105th and Tanzania ranks 104th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Tanzania: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/tanzania/">Mozambique vs Tanzania: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.