Malta vs Singapore: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Malta
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Singapore
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Malta rank
139th
Singapore rank
139th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Malta
  • Singapore
0200.0k400.0k600.0k197119962021

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Singapore ahead.

Malta ranks 139th and Singapore ranks 139th of 206 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Singapore Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —
1980s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —
1990s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —
2000s 725.76 current US$ per square kilometre 9,248 current US$ per square kilometre 8,522 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 215,256 current US$ per square kilometre 215,256 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Malta or Singapore?
Malta, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Malta and Singapore?
0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Singapore?
51 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2021.
How do Malta and Singapore rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Malta ranks 139th and Singapore ranks 139th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Singapore: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/singapore/">Malta vs Singapore: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.