Malta vs Nauru: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Malta
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Nauru
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Malta rank
139th
Nauru rank
139th
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time
- Malta
- Nauru
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Nauru, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 139th and Nauru ranks 139th of 206 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 448,271 current US$ per square kilometre | 448,271 current US$ per square kilometre | Nauru |
| 1990s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 149,854 current US$ per square kilometre | 149,854 current US$ per square kilometre | Nauru |
| 2000s | 725.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 672,367 current US$ per square kilometre | 671,641 current US$ per square kilometre | Nauru |
| 2010s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Malta or Nauru?
- Malta, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Nauru as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Malta and Nauru?
- 0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Nauru?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2021.
- How do Malta and Nauru rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
- Malta ranks 139th and Nauru ranks 139th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.