Malaysia vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Malaysia
46,762 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Saudi Arabia
29,039 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Malaysia rank
16th
Saudi Arabia rank
18th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Malaysia
  • Saudi Arabia
020.0k40.0k60.0k197019952021

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 46,762 current US$ per square kilometre against 29,039 current US$ per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 17,723 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.6 times Saudi Arabia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Malaysia ranks 16th and Saudi Arabia ranks 18th of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 4 and Saudi Arabia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1970s 1,286 current US$ per square kilometre 5,654 current US$ per square kilometre 4,368 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1980s 6,686 current US$ per square kilometre 8,143 current US$ per square kilometre 1,457 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1990s 9,355 current US$ per square kilometre 5,748 current US$ per square kilometre 3,608 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 28,303 current US$ per square kilometre 19,889 current US$ per square kilometre 8,415 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s 40,509 current US$ per square kilometre 36,786 current US$ per square kilometre 3,724 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 34,178 current US$ per square kilometre 22,971 current US$ per square kilometre 11,208 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Malaysia or Saudi Arabia?
Malaysia, at 46,762 current US$ per square kilometre against 29,039 current US$ per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Malaysia and Saudi Arabia?
17,723 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Saudi Arabia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Malaysia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Malaysia ranks 16th and Saudi Arabia ranks 18th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malaysia/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malaysia/saudi-arabia/">Malaysia vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.